Use this agent when you need to design, validate, or harden forensic audit trails for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Aider) operating in regulated environments. Focuses on tamper-evident logging, hash-chain integrity, and framework mapping for the NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Annex IV, HIPAA, and SOC 2 CC7. Specifically:\\n\\n<example>\\nContext: A healthcare company is rolling out Claude Code to engineering teams and legal is asking what audit evidence will be produced for HIPAA audits.\\nuser: \"We're approving Claude Code for 200 engineers but compliance wants proof of every prompt, tool call, and file diff touching PHI. What do we capture and how do we prove it wasn't edited?\"\\nassistant: \"I'll design an AI-agent audit architecture: hook-level capture of PreToolUse, PostToolUse, UserPromptSubmit, and Stop events into append-only JSONL with SHA-256 hash chaining and OS-level immutability (chattr +a / chflags uappnd). I'll map each event type to HIPAA §164.312(b) audit controls, define a verification procedure for auditors, and spec the SIEM pipeline so events land in Splunk or Elastic with tamper alerts.\"\\n<commentary>\\nInvoke ai-agent-audit-specialist when the question is specifically about auditing AI CODING AGENTS — not generic application logs. This agent understands Claude Code's hook model, the difference between prompt-capture and tool-call-capture, and what a regulator actually asks for.\\n</commentary>\\n</example>\\n\\n<example>\\nContext: A fintech team is preparing evidence for SOC 2 Type II and needs to show continuous monitoring of AI agent activity.\\nuser: \"SOC 2 auditor wants CC7.2 evidence that our AI coding agents are monitored. We have nothing right now.\"\\nassistant: \"I'll stand up the control: enable the agent's hook system to emit structured events, hash-chain each line so tampering is detectable, set retention to match the audit period, and wire alerting for hash-chain breaks and immutability-flag removal. I'll produce the auditor-facing control narrative mapped to CC7.2 and CC7.3, plus a re-verification script the auditor can run themselves.\"\\n<commentary>\\nUse this agent to translate abstract SOC 2 / ISO 27001 control language into concrete agent-hook configuration and verifiable evidence packages.\\n</commentary>\\n</example>\\n\\n<example>\\nContext: An EU-based defense contractor is preparing for EU AI Act Annex IV technical documentation requirements.\\nuser: \"EU AI Act applies to us from August. Annex IV wants a logging architecture description for any AI system touching classified workflows. What goes in that document?\"\\nassistant: \"I'll draft the Annex IV §2(c) logging description: event taxonomy (prompts, tool invocations, file reads, file writes, approvals, rejections), retention schedule, storage medium and tamper-evidence mechanism, access control model, and verification procedure. I'll also cross-reference Articles 12 (record-keeping) and 15 (accuracy, robustness) so the same logging substrate serves both.\"\\n<commentary>\\nInvoke when regulatory text mentions AI systems or automated decision-making AND the engineering question is specifically about what to log and how to prove it.\\n</commentary>\\n</example>
Claude Code subagent/command format. Runs in Claude Code.
✓ Writes only inside the .claude/ folder you choose — nothing else is touched.
Or install via CLI:
npx configdeck add ai-agent-audit-specialistThis config's contents are auto-scanned for shell execution, outbound network, and secret/key access.
✓ No risky behavior detected.
Loading…Security compliance and regulatory framework specialist. Use PROACTIVELY for compliance assessments, regulatory requirements, audit preparation, and governance implementation.
Use this agent when you need a security audit that is guaranteed to make no changes to the codebase. This agent has hooks in its frontmatter that block all Write, Edit, and Bash tool calls for the duration of the audit — enforcing read-only mode at the hook level, not just by convention. Invoke for compliance reviews, pre-merge audits, or any situation where auditability and non-interference are required.\n\n<example>\nContext: A compliance officer needs a security review of payment processing code without any risk of accidental modification.\nuser: \"Audit src/payments/ for PCI-DSS compliance issues. Don't touch anything.\"\nassistant: \"I'll run the read-only-auditor on src/payments/. My frontmatter hooks block Write, Edit, and Bash for the duration of this session, so no files can be modified regardless of what I find. I'll check for: unencrypted PAN storage, logging of card data, insecure TLS configurations, and missing input validation on payment fields.\"\n<commentary>\nUse read-only-auditor when the non-modification guarantee needs to be enforced at the system level, not just trusted by convention.\n</commentary>\n</example>
Automatically set up StackHawk security testing for your repository with generated configuration and GitHub Actions workflow
An AI security specialist focused on software supply chain threats: dependency
The Dynatrace Expert Agent integrates observability and security capabilities directly into GitHub workflows, enabling development teams to investigate incidents, validate deployments, triage errors, detect performance regressions, validate releases, and manage security vulnerabilities by autonomously analysing traces, logs, and Dynatrace findings. This enables targeted and precise remediation of identified issues directly within the repository.
Ask WG Code Sentinel to review your code for security issues.